Over the years of trying to develop a solid game online I found myself playing ultra tight but also ultra agressive which paid off big. This style I found to have a few problems: It sometimes was very slow, the cards dictated the action, and when depending on the cards for action some bad beats could crush a bankroll. Having the luxury of final table-ing in a few tournaments in the past month, I finally had a bankroll to try a strategy I've always wanted to try at tables where the players were good enough for it to work on. The strategy is very loose and agressive but also the priority is pot control. Bets are way smaller than any other strategy but they are frequent and thought out. Any two cards can be played in late position and the standard raise is 3x the BB. Flop play is very instinctive but the bet is usually about half the pot if checked to. Basically my goal was to control every pot I play, and to play as many hands as possible. Controlling the pot does not mean betting into it every time but more controlling the size through bets and controlling what the other players do. Bets should be small enough to call but large enough to where if an opponent raises you, he is committing a big amount of chips to be wrong.
What I found is that the swings of using this are very big. Most of the time I sit down at a table I'll lose $100-$200 (between 3 tables) total before finally getting up. When I do get up though I usually can leave the table with 3+ buy ins because of all the action I get on my big hands and all the mid sized pots I'm stealing that let me gamble when other players finally decide to raise. I get raised some, but not as often as you think. I mostly get raised when I first sit down and people notice I've been raising to $6 every hand. Also I'll bet a few flops and get raised off of those. I win more pots than I lose though and because of that when I do get raised out of a hand after firing at a flop it is more than covered for the other times I get folded to. Then of course there is the turn and river play where my bets usually stay within the 50-85% of the pot range. This is to allow me to bluff at a lot more pots and get paid off almost every time I do have a hand. I even noticed getting raised a lot more on the river by people with marginal holdings or complete bluffs. People at the table sometimes get mad and will call me a donk but its been so successful that I think its actually a decent strategy. Of course a lot of my play is based on instincts and reading what the other guy has so I can act accordingly. I mix up my play to not try to be too predictable (I start to see a lot of people limping in early positions with big hands trying to get me to build a pot for them to steal). Anyway I wanted to share this with you because of how successful its been and wanted you guys to maybe try it. Thoughts and comments too? Short term losses can be bigger than usual but over a long session you'll almost always end up.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I really like the strategy...it sounds like it allows you to be in control of the table, which in my opinion, is the ultimate goal when you're playing...It sounds like you're just playing small ball poker and keeping control of the situations so that you only let a pot get big when you want it to (aka when you have a big hand)...Another benefit to this strategy is that opponents can rarely put you on a hand bc you will most often make the same raise in late position with an 65 suited as you would with A-J or A-10...I used to be on the other end of this equation and I was always just sitting there waiting to trap the raiser with a big hand...I would wait for hours for my big hand, then when it came, I would usually end up blowing the guy off the hand after check-raising him, trying to get him to commit...Ultimately, when you are in control of the table, you are in charge of the actions and situations
One way to defend agaisnt this strategy, is to start forcing your opponent to play big pots...for example Joe, if I was playing online against you and you were utilizing this style, I would frequently raise and reraise you with air or mediocre holdings in order to try and throw you off your game...most people dont have the balls to do this and would prefer to wait for a big hand to "trap" you, but it is the wrong strategy...When someone is raising a large percentage of the pots, you have to get in there and gamble with them. You will be forced to make many tough decisions, but if you dont, you allow your opponent to run over the table and collect the cash
I also agree that this strategy is very good for making money online. I don't know how well it would work at bigger stakes games against better players but i can personally say that i have seen joe bank on this strategy.
One thing that this style does very well is it makes players over play their hands...What i mean by this is that when someone flops top pair against this strategy they will most likely play it like the nuts which like both of you have said..if they check raise you..you can fold...and when you actually do have that big hand against their top pair...this style allows you to control the pot which usually means you will get the player in a situation where he has to committ his stack when the odds are in your favor
Thanks for the input guys. At these stakes I have faced a lot of adversity against my agression and what I found the best way to counter act people who start to re-raise me is to either push, or call their bets only to fire again on the next street. Like I said sometimes I am wrong and the swings can be big but most of the time people HAVE to have a hand to call me down. A big bankroll is necessary and also the ability to gamble sometimes when a big dog.
Post a Comment